<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chippy&#039;s Hiblue Lab &#187; moorestown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hiblue.com/tag/moorestown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hiblue.com</link>
	<description>Cloud-hopping with Mobility and the best of Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Video is still a major issue for millions of netbooks.</title>
		<link>http://hiblue.com/2009/07/21/flash-video-is-still-a-major-issue-for-millions-of-netbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://hiblue.com/2009/07/21/flash-video-is-still-a-major-issue-for-millions-of-netbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moorestown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pinetrail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiblue.com/2009/07/flash-video-is-still-a-major-issue-for-millions-of-netbooks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly two years ago, Adobe announced that the Flash 9 player would support H.264. There was talk of ‘hardware acceleration’ too but event though we’re up to version 10 of the player, its still one of the most CPU-heavy video playback methods there is. Not only does it appear (in testing with many UMPCs over the last 2 years) to be CPU intensive but it still can’t hook into any H.264 hardware decoding that is available on many pc’s out there now. What are Adobe doing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly two years ago, <a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2007/08/839">Adobe announced that the Flash 9 player would support H.264</a>. There was talk of ‘hardware acceleration’ too but event though we’re up to version 10 of the player, its still one of the most CPU-heavy video playback methods there is. Not only does it appear (in testing with many UMPCs over the last 2 years) to be CPU intensive but it still can’t hook into any H.264 hardware decoding that is available on many pc’s out there now. What are Adobe doing? </p>
<p>Is there a problem with hooking into the hardware layer? XP was always difficult in that respect but Windows Vista introduced&#160; DXVA 2.0 which was supposed to make hardware acceleration easier. Not easy enough for Adobe it seems.</p>
<p>They must know about the problem because you don’t have to search too far in the netbook computing space to find a ton of questions about the topic. The flash video experience on a netbook, umpc and MID simply sucks! It looks like it will take a big GPU manufacturer to convince (read: pay) Adobe to fix this and that’s why Nvidia and Broadcom have said that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5275284/adobe-promises-flash-video-acceleration-on-netbooks-not-for-a-while-and-not-for-everyone">things will change</a> in 2010. Unfortunately, that doesn&#8217;t help the majority of the small , cheap PCs based on the GMA950 and GMA500 chipset. It looks like nothing will change for devices based on these platforms.</p>
<p>One hope for the big low-cost, low-end (largely Intel-based) notebook and mobile computing market is that Intel get together with Adobe to make sure that the next generation of the netbook platform and mobile computing platform&#160; is supported. No-one knows what GPU core is in those platforms yet (Pinetrail and Moorestown) so maybe Intel will surprise us with a Broadcom core and a hardware accelerated Adobe Flash player in Moblin at IDF in Sept. As for the high-end devices, maybe Adobe is just happy to let everything run in <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/systemreqs/#recommended">big fat, power-hungry CPUs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hiblue.com/2009/07/21/flash-video-is-still-a-major-issue-for-millions-of-netbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

